• Q: Undeveloped intellectual properties are intangible since they are not producing income at the present time; therefore, they cannot be considered as a basis for a loan.
• A: Not making loans in nearly every situation except this one is a very sound financial decision to avoid large scale financial loses. However, in my situation, my dominance of valuable intellectual property conception over rules this general principle. The critical factor is the shift from other persons obtaining my intellectual property conceptions through dubious means to my controllable pre-conception contractual IP conceptions in a controlled environment that my company is now exclusively offering. Another reality is that with the invention clusters that I have assembled in my lifetime, it should be provable to your financier group that I possess intellectual property domination with regards to new significant marketable valuable intellectual property conception. Therefore; the investment in theory should be the top investment in the world. The only variables are the ability to obtain the patents from the USPTO and other international patent offices and obtaining funding and assembling winning teams. None of these objectives can be accomplished with sufficient funding and the integrity of the offices involved regarding the awarding of the patents to the correct inventorship names.
• Q: The values of the intellectual properties are questionable or speculative since the markets for them are unproven.
• A: I can protect financiers against risk in several manners since your dealing with, by far, the world’s largest source of marketable intellectual property conception, the odds of valuable conception are the highest on earth in the range of 95% plus. This rate can be increased further by selective category conceptions in those markets that are performing well in bad economic times. Another method of odds improvement that I have conceived is approaching specific countries with the guarantee of manufacturing the new products in a group in exchange for guaranteed patent issuances without nationalization possibilities. My continuation to pursue improvements in global patent system inventorship determinations means improvements in patent awarding to the correct entity are likely to be rising further.
• Q: During such hard economic times, little or nothing of intellectual property is going to sell, although it may have sold during prosperous economic times.
• A: New Patented Products produce unsatisfied consumer demand that drives profits to high levels no matter what the economic climate is. Older products produce pent up demand in cycles as the original products become obsolete by my new products or potentially receive compensations from law suits due to original incorrect inventorship determination. Sufficient investments in our legal department to cover necessary lawsuits will help us to compete in litigation awarding.
• Q: What guarantees do I have that my funds will be managed and invested correctly?
• A: My own poverty and desire to escape it is a powerful driving force. My track record of IP filings, when investigated, reveal the correct line of conception in each case. We are willing to provide a monthly statement of accomplishments in order to keep the financier informed. We also have direct participation for all investment partnerships available for all financiers including hands on involvement if desired.
• Q: Why hasn’t my company gone to the top of the stock market by now?
• A: Because we haven’t had any investment due to my company’s lack of previous investment. It takes money to make money and we have any significant money to begin with. Starting small and working up hasn’t been a viable option due to lack of persons willing to invest or pay for early stage intellectual properties. Since our only product is intellectual property conceptions, we don’t have a yearly history of annual revenues. This is because we are the world’s largest conceiver and are seeking partnerships with others to take the intellectual properties forward. We are a unfunded job creation incubator with no startup fund, however with a proven track record of multi-trillion dollar IP conceptions.
• Q: Will funding be used for top human advancement beneficial projects?
• A: We’re reserving these projects for our present IP users, uncompensated, who don’t want to reinvest or pay for their intellectual properties.
• Q: What would be the adversely negative consequences of not funding this inventor in the creation of critical projects for development?
• A: The failure of humanity to advance any further than its present stage. The continued non-conception due to lack of funding of some 2,800 and counting top valuable marketable intellectual properties will be the continuation of the black hole in invention that began 2004 and although requested, no funding has been proposed by Barrack Obama or any officials from my home state of Florida.

Patented intellectual properties include the right of collecting damages for infringement and counterfeit goods seizures and associated business shutdowns to produce an un-encroached as a reward for the rare brilliant marketable conception. Paying a percentage of profits to the inventor ensures continued conceptions to continue human advancement. The operator of these franchises receive high profit potential from unsatisfied consumer demand products and services that they would not receive in other segments of business startup. Also received is the ability to grow the business larger through the purchase of other intellectual properties to obtain financial independence and security for the individual , his or her family, and his or her share holders.

Innovation Retardation under the Obama Administration

Unfortunately during the middle of our worst economic crisis, we presently have in Washington an individual who has stalled many programs due to his anti-inventor policies instead of investing in new unsatisfied consumer demand business startups. Mr. Obama is stopping and delaying and misappropriating funds to the wrong projects. Examples include; progressive instead of retartive patent reform, the apparently stalled high speed rail experiment, NASA space exploration cancellations, and potentially hundreds of other critical or significant human advancements through non-patenting incentive and non-funding of projects. This continuing and accelerating the economic stagnation of the U.S. and global economies.